26 Nov Pettipas v. Pettipas

             The defendant, Harry Pettipas, has four sons: Gregory, Blake, Trevor and Michael. Three of Harry’s four sons commenced separate actions against him to recover a share of the profits realized upon the sale of property located at 56th Avenue, in Langley, B.C. Gregory and Blake’s actions were dismissed and no appeals were filed. The remaining action before me involves a claim by Michael that he is entitled to a share in the sale proceeds from the 56th Avenue property due to work he performed on the property. Michael also claims that he is entitled to an interest in a company operated by Harry entitled Tripett Enterprises Inc. (“Tripett”), which manufactures dog food made from tripe. Lastly, Michael claims restitution for the work done in respect of a company called GLT Gemstar Limousine Technologies International Inc. (“GLT”). Michael developed a prototype racing vehicle and he alleges that Harry agreed to become a joint venture partner in the marketing and sale of the prototype. As a result of Harry’s failure to honour the terms of their joint venture agreement, Michael claims GLT lost substantial profits and he was never paid the wages promised by his father....

Read More

20 Oct Wahl v. Sidhu

             In this personal injury action the 39 year old plaintiff claims damages for injuries the he says were sustained on June 22, 2006 when he was driving his employer’s 1988 Ford Pickup Truck which was loaded with two large tires weighing approximately 1,200 pounds each.  He was in the process of delivering them to a destination while carrying out his business duties for his employer, Midway Tire Limited. ...

Read More

23 Aug Grewal-Cheema v. Tassone

             The plaintiff claims damages for negligence arising out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred on March 23, 2007.  The vehicle being driven by the defendant Alberto Tassone rear ended the plaintiff’s vehicle.  Liability has been admitted.  I must assess the damages....

Read More

26 Jul Geiger v. Schmidt

             Ms. Geiger, the plaintiff, suffered injuries in two accidents a year apart. The first accident occurred on December 1, 2007, the second a year later, on December 3, 2008. The plaintiff started two separate actions, but a Master ordered them heard together....

Read More

22 Mar Hauer v. Clendenning

             The plaintiff sustained soft tissue injuries in a motor vehicle accident on August 6, 2006.  By the time of trial, her primary concerns were over persistent low back and shoulder pain.  Although she had sustained soft tissue injuries affecting her back and shoulder in a 1996 motor vehicle accident, she had been free of pain symptoms for three years prior to the 2006 accident....

Read More

01 Mar MacIntyre v. Pitt Meadows Secondary School

             Evan MacIntyre is presently 22 years old.  He is the plaintiff in these three actions which were heard at the same time.  Due to the fact that most of the events relevant to the actions occurred while the plaintiff was a minor, I will refer to him by his first name in these reasons.  In doing so, I intend the plaintiff no disrespect....

Read More

15 Feb Cabral v. Brice

             Danny Cabral was driving a pick-up truck when he was struck from behind by a commercial truck driven by Andrew Brice. The accident occurred on March 31, 2006, in Langley, British Columbia....

Read More

20 Jan Smaill v. Williams

             The present action arises out of two motor vehicle accidents.  The first accident occurred July 25, 2000, when the plaintiff was struck from behind as a pedestrian, while walking down the street near his home and the second accident occurred September 18, 2000, when the plaintiff was rear ended....

Read More