26 Aug Saintonge v. Puni

             These are applications for directions brought pursuant to Rule 14-1(7)(a) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, B.C. Reg. 168/2009 [Civil Rules]. The issue requires a consideration of Rule 14-1(1)(f)(i)(ii), which reads as follows:(1)        If costs are payable to a party under these Supreme Court Civil Rules or by order, those costs must be assessed as party and party costs in accordance with Appendix B unless any of the following circumstances exist:…(f) subject to subrule (10) of this rule,(i)   the only relief granted in the action is one or more of money, … and the plaintiff recovers a judgment in which the total value of the relief granted is $100,000 or less, exclusive of interest and costs,(ii)   …in which event, Rule 15-1(15) to (17) applies to the action unless the court orders otherwise....

Read More

20 Jun Sandhu v. Wilk

             This is an assessment of costs following settlement of a claim by the plaintiff arising out of injuries he sustained in a motor vehicle accident on February 10, 2009....

Read More

02 Dec Babb v. Doell

             This is a review of a party/party bill of costs following settlement of a claim involving injuries resulting from a 2008 motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff, who had sustained injuries in a fall in 2006, sustained further injuries in the 2008 motor vehicle accident....

Read More

04 Oct Kennedy v. Turtle Bay Marina Inc.

             This is an application to add The Owners, Strata Plan KAS1913 (the “Strata Corporation”) as a defendant to this action, together with consequential amendments to the style of cause and notice of civil claim....

Read More

24 Sep Franzman v. Munro

             The background to this matter is set out in the affidavit of Joseph A. Zak made July 12, 2013. In his affidavit, Mr. Zak deposes as follows:1.         I am counsel for Tammy Franzman, the plaintiff in this action, and as such have direct knowledge of the information deposed to in this Affidavit.A.        The Claim2.         This action was brought for the recovery of damages for personal injury and loss suffered by the plaintiff as a result of a head-on motor vehicle collision that occurred on October 16, 2008 on Westsyde Road south of the hamlet of Black Pines near Kamloops, BC.3.         In order to investigate the issue of liability, establish the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s injuries, the resulting financial consequences and the cost of future care, it was necessary to retain and consult with a number of experts. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a summary of the expert reports that were commissioned on behalf of the plaintiff as well as on behalf of the defence. The reports are voluminous and copies will be made available for the assessment.B.        Accident Circumstances4.         At the location of the collision, Westsyde Road is a paved two lane highway that runs in a north and south direction. The driving lanes are separated by a single yellow centre line. The highway is flanked to the east by a precipitous drop to the North Thompson River and to the west by a long ditch. The posted speed limit is 80 kph.5.         The plaintiff was driving her red 1999 Chevrolet Venture van south to Kamloops for a medical appointment.6.         The defendant, Shelley Maureen Munro (“Munro”), was driving a white 1993 Ford Taurus (“Taurus”) north returning to her home after driving her daughter and grandchildren to their home in Kamloops. The Taurus was registered to Munro’s common-law husband, the defendant, Dag Alfred Goddyn (“Goddyn”).7.         The plaintiff had rounded a bend in the road when she saw Munro driving toward her...

Read More

29 Jul Smith v. Rautenberg

             By notice of application filed June 3, 2013, the defendant seeks the following order:1.         Dr. Ann Pirolli of #204 - 3001 Tutt Street, Kelowna, BC, V1Y 2H4 make and deliver to the solicitor for the Defendant a certified copy of all records, including all raw test data including but not limited to test protocols; testing notes; behavioural observations; scoring sheets; computerized scoring or interpretation reports and normative profile sheets for all neuropsychological testing in her possession, custody or control relating to the Plaintiff, Shirley Anne Smith (the “Records”);...

Read More

07 Jun Dakin v. Roth

             This is an appointment to assess the bills of costs of the plaintiff following a five-day trial before Mr. Justice Cole. In reasons for judgment cited at Dakin v. Roth, 2013 BCSC 8, the plaintiff was awarded $108,000.00. The order confirmed she is awarded her costs....

Read More

03 Apr Wiebe v. Douglas

             By notice of application filed October 24, 2012, the defendant sought orders for disclosure, together with costs in any event of the cause. The orders sought in the notice of application, Part 1, paragraphs 1, 3, 4 and 5 were resolved between the plaintiff and the defendant. The order sought in Part 1, paragraph 2 of the notice of application is as follows:2.         BC Ambulance Service shall make available for examination, on a mutually agreeable date and time, the employees identified on the Patient Care Report, as employee #76561 with the initials LE and employee #49322, initials DR, being the driver and ambulance attendant who attended the scene of the subject accident....

Read More

07 Feb Carson v. Henyecz

             This is an assessment of the bill of costs of the plaintiff. At the commencement of the assessment, counsel advised that by agreement, coloured printing of $781.00 which was claimed at $1.50 per copy for a total of $1,171.50 would be allowed at $1.00 per copy for a total of $781.00, a reduction of $390.50 and associated taxes....

Read More

09 Nov Parent v. Lohia

             These are assessments of two bills of costs presented by the plaintiff following settlement of two motor vehicle accidents in which the plaintiff was injured....

Read More