Welcome to the Acheson Sweeney Foley Sahota personal injury case law database.

Our firm has collected and organized a number of personal injury court decisions in a publicly-accessible database, for use as a resource by law students, other lawyers and firms, as well as the general public. This database will include some of our firm’s results, as well as results from many other lawyers. For information about results from this firm only, please click here.

The British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal are the sources for all of the cases in this database; these cases are not official versions of the material produced, and were not made in affiliation with or the endorsement of the British Columbia Superior Courts.




Dzumhur v. Davoody

            This action claims damages for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on June 1, 2012 at the intersection of No. 5 and Bath Roads in Richmond, B.C.  At that time the plaintiff was driving his van northbound in the center lane on No. 5 Road when the defendant left the westbound stop sign at the T-intersection intending to make a left turn south onto No. 5 Road.  The defendant drove into the path of the plaintiff's oncoming vehicle and a violent collision ensued....

Read More

Bhandal v. Charlebois

            Satvinder Singh Bhandal claims damages for personal injuries he suffered in a car accident on April 29, 2011.  Mr. Bhandal was in his vehicle in the left northbound lane on No. 3 Road in Richmond just south of the intersection with Williams Road, waiting or starting to turn left into a mall parking lot, when he was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by the defendant, Daniel Kane Charlebois....

Read More

Hickey v. The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Vancouver

            The genesis of this case is a slip and fall incident that happened while the plaintiff was assisting in distributing Holy Ashes to the congregation during Mass at the Roman Catholic Church, Christ the Redeemer on February 17, 2010....

Read More

Scarfe v. Fernco Developments Ltd.

            The plaintiff slipped on a wet floor in the bathroom of the Nanaimo Burger King restaurant on May 4, 2010 and injured his right shoulder and right knee. The plaintiff initiated proceedings against several defendants but the proceedings against Fernco Developments Ltd., Norco Developments Ltd. and Burger King Restaurants of Canada Inc. were all discontinued. The only remaining defendant is Seacastle Enterprises Inc.ISSUES1)       Liability2)       General damages3)       Loss of earning capacityLIABILITYThe Facts...

Read More

Carson v. Stucchi

            This is an application for an order that this action (the “first action”) and the Vancouver Registry Action S116773, Carson v. City of Vancouver, Constable Marynick, Constable Stewart and John Doe #3 (the “second action”) be tried at the same time and before the same trial judge....

Read More

TeBaerts v. Penta Builders Group Inc.

            THE COURT:  Following a four‑day trial of this wrongful dismissal action, the plaintiff was the successful party. Almost the whole of the trial focused on the defendant's allegations of cause. I concluded the defendants had not established cause and the plaintiff was entitled to reasonable notice of 12 months. I dismissed her more minor claims for aggravated and punitive damages, as well as a small tort claim for breach of privacy....

Read More

Stocker v. Osei-Appiah

             The defendant Jaime Theresa Osei-Appiah applies for an order pursuant to Rule 7-6 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules requiring the plaintiff Robert Peter Stocker to attend a functional capacity evaluation by Jeff Padvaiskas, an occupational therapist, on January 11, 2016 and a vocational assessment by Ms. Samantha Gallagher, a vocational consultant, on January 14, 2016.BACKGROUND...

Read More

Bergen v. Gaetz

             The plaintiff claims damages arising from two motor vehicle accidents (the “Accidents”). The Accidents occurred March 2, 2009 (the “First Accident”) and November 27, 2010 (the “Second Accident”) and were both rear end collisions....

Read More

Gee v. Basra

             THE COURT:  There are two applications before me. The first is a defence application for an authorization for the production of certain medical records of the plaintiff, and the next is an application that the plaintiff attend an independent medical examination with a neurologist.Application for an authorization for the production of certain medical records of the plaintiff...

Read More

Easton v. Chen

             The present action stems from a motor vehicle accident on July 6, 2011 (the “accident”)....

Read More

McLean v. Kraft

- [3] II. ISSUES [4] - [10] III. EVIDENCE AT TRIAL [11] - [136] A. THE PLAINTIFF [12] - [43] 1. Background [12] - [24] 2. The Accident of September 11, 2010 [25] - [33] 3. Post Accident Events, Treatment and Recovery [34] - [43] B. WITNESSES [44] - [136] 1. Family and Friends of the Plaintiff [44] - [61] (a) Julia McLean [44] - [50] (b) Laura Larsen [51] - [53] (c) Tyra Crump [54] - [57] (d) Susan Hample [58] - [61] 2. Employers [62] - [73] (a) Dr. Alex Penner [62] - [68] (b) Dr. Faro Aghdasi [69] - [73] 3. Treating ...

Read More

Preston v. Kontzamanis

             This action arises from a motor vehicle collision that occurred on May 1, 2005 in Vancouver.  The plaintiff was driving a 1991 Toyota Tercel owned by his daughter on 12th Avenue near its intersection with Nanaimo Street when it was struck from behind by a vehicle driven by the defendant....

Read More

Contact us today to find the best lawyer for your case.