30 Oct Ash v. Zellers Inc.

             This is a request for documents by the plaintiff in a suit for personal injury which occurred during the course of the plaintiff’s arrest by the personal defendant, while he was employed by the corporate defendant as a Loss Prevention Officer. The documents the plaintiff seeks are three application forms the personal defendant filled out when seeking employment with the Metro Vancouver Transit Police, the Vancouver Police Department and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. All three were filled out while he was in the employ of Zellers Inc.Factual Background...

Read More

23 Oct Johal v. Conron

             The plaintiff, Surinder Kaur Johal, claims damages for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on June 10, 2009. Liability is not in issue....

Read More

24 Sep Sidhu v. Hothi

             This matter is an appeal from the decision of a master in Sidhu v. Hothi, 2013 BCSC 939, dismissing the defendants’ application to withdraw admissions of liability made in the response to civil claim and to amend the response to civil claim....

Read More

24 Sep Franzman v. Munro

             The background to this matter is set out in the affidavit of Joseph A. Zak made July 12, 2013. In his affidavit, Mr. Zak deposes as follows:1.         I am counsel for Tammy Franzman, the plaintiff in this action, and as such have direct knowledge of the information deposed to in this Affidavit.A.        The Claim2.         This action was brought for the recovery of damages for personal injury and loss suffered by the plaintiff as a result of a head-on motor vehicle collision that occurred on October 16, 2008 on Westsyde Road south of the hamlet of Black Pines near Kamloops, BC.3.         In order to investigate the issue of liability, establish the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s injuries, the resulting financial consequences and the cost of future care, it was necessary to retain and consult with a number of experts. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a summary of the expert reports that were commissioned on behalf of the plaintiff as well as on behalf of the defence. The reports are voluminous and copies will be made available for the assessment.B.        Accident Circumstances4.         At the location of the collision, Westsyde Road is a paved two lane highway that runs in a north and south direction. The driving lanes are separated by a single yellow centre line. The highway is flanked to the east by a precipitous drop to the North Thompson River and to the west by a long ditch. The posted speed limit is 80 kph.5.         The plaintiff was driving her red 1999 Chevrolet Venture van south to Kamloops for a medical appointment.6.         The defendant, Shelley Maureen Munro (“Munro”), was driving a white 1993 Ford Taurus (“Taurus”) north returning to her home after driving her daughter and grandchildren to their home in Kamloops. The Taurus was registered to Munro’s common-law husband, the defendant, Dag Alfred Goddyn (“Goddyn”).7.         The plaintiff had rounded a bend in the road when she saw Munro driving toward her...

Read More

19 Sep Abbott v. Glaim

             This is an action for damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff, Joyce Abbott, as a result of an alleged assault that took place in the early morning of March 25, 2006. Ms. Abbott claims that she was pushed backwards down an outside set of stairs by the defendant Lucy Glaim. The incident took place at a house in Moricetown, British Columbia where Ms. Abbott and Ms. Glaim were both attending a house party....

Read More

03 Sep Ahonen v. Thauli

             The question before me concerns the amount damages that should be awarded to the plaintiff, Jo-Ann Ahonen, as a result of injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident on April 17, 2009 (the "MVA")....

Read More

23 Aug Paller v. Regan

             THE COURT:  The plaintiff sues for compensation for injuries sustained in a car accident. Liability for the accident is admitted, but the defendants take the position that the mechanism of the accident could not have caused the injuries claimed by the plaintiff. Causation is thus in issue, as is the amount of damages.BACKGROUND...

Read More

13 Aug Langille v. Nguyen

             The plaintiff, Donna Langille, was involved in three motor vehicle accidents in 2004, 2009, and 2010. Ms. Langille claims that she suffered injuries in all the accidents ‒ in particular, chronic back and shoulder pain and a mild brain injury ‒ which affect her and restrict her activities to this day. She claims damages for non‑pecuniary loss, past income loss, future income loss, future cost of care and the value of services provided....

Read More