26 Mar Peters v. Ortner
The defendants apply pursuant to Rule 14-1(15) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules for apportionment of costs arising from the trial of this matter....
The defendants apply pursuant to Rule 14-1(15) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules for apportionment of costs arising from the trial of this matter....
Are British Columbia residents who are involved in a motor vehicle accident in Saskatchewan able to sue for damages in tort in British Columbia, or are they bound by Saskatchewans no-fault insurance scheme?...
This is a claim for damages arising from two motor vehicle accidents. Liability for both accidents was admitted on the morning of trial. At issue are the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, the effect and extent of the plaintiffs pre-existing condition, the cause of his current injuries and what entitlement the plaintiff has to damages for non-pecuniary loss, future loss of earning capacity, future care costs, special damages and accelerated depreciation respecting his vehicle. No claim is advanced for past wage loss.The Accidents...
In the two actions before the court, three accidents, none of which were the fault of the plaintiff, give rise to a claim for damages. The first occurred on September 19, 2008. The second and third occurred on July 23, 2009 and on June 1, 2013, respectively. Liability has been admitted for each, with the exception that contributory negligence is pled in connection with the first accident. The plaintiff was not wearing a seatbelt, and it is alleged that her injuries would not have been as severe had she done so. This is not conceded.II...
This is a claim for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred July 26, 2010. The defendant has admitted liability for the accident and -quite refreshingly - has admitted the plaintiff was injured in the accident....
The plaintiff was injured in two car accidents, one on February 18, 2006, when she was 17 years old and in her last year of high school, and the other on March 26, 2010, when she was in her fourth year of university. She suffered injuries that left her with pain in her back, neck and right shoulder. She eventually had surgery on her shoulder....
The plaintiff seeks damages - loss of past and future earning capacity; cost of future care; special damages; and loss of housekeeping capacity - for a pedestrian-vehicle accident that occurred on September 5, 2005....
These reasons address the assessment of costs in two personal injury actions governed by Rule 15-1 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules (SCCR). The style of cause in the second action is Harvey v. Phillips, Victoria Registry No. 11-4905 (the Phillips action). Brittany Harvey is the sole plaintiff in both actions. By order of the court, the trials in these actions were to be heard at the same time. The two actions were settled for a global figure about four days before the commencement of trial....
The plaintiff claims damages for injuries resulting from a motor vehicle accident (the MVA) caused by the negligence of the defendant. The defendant does not dispute his liability for the collision....
The following constitute my oral reasons for judgment with respect to the trial of this proceeding which took place on February 26-28, 2014....