Welcome to the Acheson Sweeney Foley Sahota personal injury case law database.

Our firm has collected and organized a number of personal injury court decisions in a publicly-accessible database, for use as a resource by law students, other lawyers and firms, as well as the general public. This database will include some of our firm’s results, as well as results from many other lawyers. For information about results from this firm only, please click here.

The British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal are the sources for all of the cases in this database; these cases are not official versions of the material produced, and were not made in affiliation with or the endorsement of the British Columbia Superior Courts.




Whippy v. Akerley

             THE COURT:  These reasons for judgment are subject to editorial revisions before their reproduction in final form. Those revisions may include the insertion of additional references to the evidence, authorities, or submissions. In no manner will the results of my decision be changed....

Read More

Luining v. Luining

             THE COURT:  This is an application by the defendants for orders that the plaintiff attend an independent medical examination by Dr. Eytan David, an otolaryngologist, or ear, nose, and throat specialist (ENT), and a functional capacity evaluation by Shawna Bonsen, an occupational therapist and certified functional capacity evaluator....

Read More

Best v. Jerzyk

 The plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident on March 20, 2013 and suffered soft tissue injury.  The defendant has admitted liability.  The main issue in dispute is loss of earning capacity.II.               Facts...

Read More

Gamble v. Brown

             This is an application by the defendant for an order that the plaintiff, Michelle Gamble, sign an authorization addressed to Todd Wytrychowski and Horne Wytrychowski of Airdrie, Alberta, the former solicitors of the plaintiff. The defendant’s proposed authorization is in the following words:production of any part of your file in respect of my motor vehicle accident which took place in Alberta on March 19, 2009 which refers to defines, describes or comments upon the nature and extent of my injuries arising from that accident and the effects of that accident on my physical and mental health and, in particular, any mediation brief, settlement letter, file memo, communication or similar document in that regard...

Read More

Helina v. Percival

             The appellant, Sandra Helina, appeals from a decision of the Provincial Court in which her claim for personal injuries was dismissed on a no evidence motion....

Read More

McLeod v. Lifelabs BC LP

             The plaintiff, Barbara McLeod, was employed by the defendant, Lifelabs BC LP and Lifelabs BC Inc., for 25 ½ years when she was terminated without cause from her position as process improvement manager....

Read More

MacLean Law v. Miolla

            THE COURT: I have had an opportunity to review my notes and I intend to give oral reasons. Because they are oral reasons, if a transcript is requested, I reserve the right to edit them....

Read More

Fitger v. John Doe

             The trial of this motor vehicle injury case is set for May 2016 before a jury. Following a summary trial of several issues, I provided oral reasons for not severing the liability issue from the assessment of damages, as sought by the plaintiff....

Read More

Mann v. Elphick

             The plaintiff, Amarjit Singh Mann brings an application that he be granted leave to use certain documents revealed during the course of this litigation which have an implied undertaking that these documents not be used except for the purposes of this litigation. ...

Read More

Jones v. West Shore Parks and Recreation Society

             The plaintiff seeks an order for broad document disclosure by the defendants as well as two non-parties. Much of the relief sought was resolved by agreement through counsel. The only issue before the court is whether the defendants ought to disclose two documents over which litigation privilege is claimed. Those documents are described in the defendants’ list of documents as Claimspro Inc. – Independent Adjuster’s Preliminary Report dated September 10, 2013 and Claimspro Inc. – Independent Adjuster’s Confidential Report #1 dated October 31, 2013....

Read More

Contact us today to find the best lawyer for your case.