28 Dec March v. Stanley T. Cope
On September 15th, 2011, Stanley T. Cope filed an appointment for the review of the bills that he had rendered to his former client, Ms. Belinda March....
On September 15th, 2011, Stanley T. Cope filed an appointment for the review of the bills that he had rendered to his former client, Ms. Belinda March....
The plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident on September 10, 2007. She seeks compensation for her injuries. Both liability and damages are in dispute.Liability...
The plaintiff seeks an order for special costs of the defendants application to dismiss the plaintiffs claim, including special costs of todays application. The plaintiff submits the defendants had no proper foundation to make such a manifestly deficient application that was designed to punish the plaintiff for errors that were the responsibility of her employer. The plaintiff says the conduct of the defendants is aggravated by the fact liability has been admitted, and a dismissal of the action would have denied the plaintiff damages to which she is entitled....
The plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident on August 31, 2006. I have concluded that the greater portion of fault rests with the defendant. I have also found that the plaintiff suffered a period of disability of approximately five months duration, following which he continued to have minimal residual symptoms attributable to the accident. However, I have found that the majority of his complaints since the end of his period of disability, and moving forward into the future, are and will be attributable not to the subject accident, but to a longstanding pre-existing back condition and to other independent factors for which the defendant bears no liability.Circumstances of Accident and Liability...
THE COURT: The plaintiff, Ms. Campbell, was involved in two motor vehicle accidents, one in 2006 and the other in 2008. She has commenced legal actions seeking damages against the drivers of the other vehicles and the trials of those actions are set to be heard jointly, commencing on 6 February 2012 for 25 days....
The plaintiff applicant seeks an order that:1-1. The Victoria Police Department, (hereafter referred to as the "Police") shall, within 7 days of an Order made in these proceedings being served upon the Police, provide to the Plaintiff by delivery to the Plaintiffs lawyer at 103 - 832 Fisgard Street, Victoria, B.C. V8W 1S1 one copy of all records including copies of Informations or Indictments, Violation Tickets, Offence Notices, Traffic Tickets, investigative reports and notes, reports to Crown Counsel, statements, tape recordings, video recordings, copies of Officers notes and photographs in the form in which they were originally made (that is if originally made in digital form, then to be produced in digital form and if originally made as film, then to be produced as film) pertaining to investigations made by the Police in respect of investigations concerning the motor vehicle crash that occurred on May 11. 2011 at the intersection of Hillside Avenue and Bridge Street, Victoria. BC, and more particularly, police file 2011-16399; and1-2. The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia produce one copy of any and all statements. written or oral, given by the Plaintiff or by Elvira Polianskaia or Vladimir Polianski to any adjuster in connection with the motor vehicle crash that occurred on May 11. 2011 at the intersection of Hillside Avenue and Bridge Street. Victoria, BC;1-3. THAT at such time as the Police and the parties' lawyers agree on, the Police shall produce the originals of all documents covered by this Order in their possession, custody, or control, for inspection by those lawyers and on written request by any party or their lawyer for records shall provide one copy of any such record to the requesting lawyer for which a copy has not already been provided;1-4. THAT within 14 days after the Plaintiffs lawyer receives the copies of the records ordered produced herein he shall provide a copy of all such documents to the Defendant or Defendant's lawyer;1-5. THAT after production the...
Rolf Reiner Kumant (Mr. Kumant) was injured in a motor vehicle accident. Liability is admitted. This is an assessment of his damages.I. BACKGROUND...
On October 26, 2011, I dismissed the defendants application for an order that the plaintiff attend an independent medical examination with Dr. Kevin Solomons. The appointment with Dr. Solomons was scheduled to take place in Vancouver the day after the application was brought. The application was brought on short notice to the plaintiff....
THE COURT: This is an application for the following relief:1. The Defendant HARLEY- DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY GROUP, LLC ("HDMC"), through its representative Lance Onan, will submit to an examination for discovery at the offices of Coast Reporting 1101 - 808 Nelson Street, Vancouver, B.C. at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, November 29, 2011 or such other time and date as may be convenient for Mr. Onan and counsel for the Plaintiff to2. a. answer the questions attached as Schedule A and to answer any questions arising from those questions, andb. to continue the examination for discovery which was adjourned on November 15, 2011.3. The length of the examination which is the subject of this order must not exceed 7 hours in duration, excluding the length of the examination Mr. Onan which took place on November 15, 2011, or any period to which the Defendant HDMC consents, subject to any further court order.4. The costs of and incidental to the attendance of Mr. Onan at the examination for discovery which is the subject of this order, and the costs of and incidental to this motion, are payable by the Defendant HDMC to the Plaintiff in any event of the cause....
The plaintiff seeks damages from the defendants for battery in an incident at the Caprice Nightclub on Granville Street, Vancouver, on August 27, 2006. Both liability and damages are in issue....