11 Jan Lenko v. Lenko
Mari-Anne and Dan Lenko were married on September 22, 1990. They have two children, a daughter A, who is 15, and a son M, who is 13. The couple separated in August 2007. Ms. Lenko is 44; Mr. Lenko is 54....
Mari-Anne and Dan Lenko were married on September 22, 1990. They have two children, a daughter A, who is 15, and a son M, who is 13. The couple separated in August 2007. Ms. Lenko is 44; Mr. Lenko is 54....
On November 28, 2008, the plaintiff, then 76 years old, tripped over the corner of a wooden pallet in the defendants Superstore, fell down, and broke her hip. She had surgery to pin her hip together but within nine months the hardware failed and she had to have two further operations: one to remove the hardware and another to replace her entire hip. Fortunately, the last surgery was successful and the plaintiff is finally on the road to recovery....
It was a busy morning in chambers when the parties appeared before me on the defendants application for an order that the plaintiff in this personal injury action attend for two independent medical examinations, the first booked for the following week. The application threatened to exceed the estimate provided by counsel, not an unusual circumstance but one which resulted in part of the application being adjourned for written submissions. Given that one of the examinations was scheduled for the following week and that the parties were in partial agreement, I made the order for the plaintiff to attend the two independent medical examinations as follows: (a) an examination by orthopaedic surgeon Dr. John Oliver on Friday December 3, 2010 at 1:00 p.m.; and (b) a work capacity evaluation with occupational therapist Jeff Padvaiskas on Monday January 10, 2011 at 8:30 a.m....
On June 25, 2010, I gave oral reasons for judgment in a Rule 18A (as it then was) application for summary dismissal of the plaintiffs claim for damages in a personal injury action....
THE COURT: In September 2006, the plaintiff attended a Vernon Vipers hockey game at the Multiplex in Vernon. The Multiplex is a sports and convention facility owned by the defendant, the Regional District of North Okanagan (NORD), and operated and maintained at the time the defendant, Canadian Recreational Excellence (Vernon) Corporation (CRE)....
This is an appeal pursuant to s. 81 of the Child, Family and Community Service Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 46, from the decision of Judge R.R. Smith of the Provincial Court of British Columbia of June 16, 2010. In his decision, Judge Smith denied the Directors application for a declaration that the child, M.K.M., was in need of protection pursuant to s. 40 of the Child, Family and Community Service Act....
THE COURT: This is the application of the third party to strike the claim against her pursuant to Rule 9‑5(1)(a), (b), (c), and (d). In the action, the plaintiff claims damages arising from injuries she sustained September 30, 2009, as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendants....
Mr. John M. Sims, past committee and current executor of the estate of Gordon Anderson Hall, applies for two heads of relief (to quote the application): to pass his accounts for the period February 28th, 2005 through May 19th, 2009 andto recommend a fair and reasonable allowance for Mr. Sims for his care, pain, trouble, and time expended in and about the estate in administering, disposing of, arranging, and settling the affairs of the estate during the same period. ...
The third party applies under Rule 9-8(5) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, B.C. Reg. 168/2009, for an order that the defendant, Jennifer Lynn Williams, pay the third partys costs of defending the third party proceedings. ...
THE COURT: This proceeding involves tort claims against the alleged assailants of an infant, E.B., while in foster care as well as against the Provincial Director of Child Welfare (the Director) and the provincial Crown (the ministry). E.B. apparently suffered a severe traumatic brain injury as a result of the alleged assault and requires an extremely high level of care at all times....