This is an application pursuant to Rule 9-7 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules that the action commenced by the plaintiff be dismissed on the basis that the limitation period had expired by the time the action was commenced on October 5, 2009. The Action is set for Trial on October 31, 2011.BACKGROUND...
On January 22, 2003, a vehicle operated by the defendant, Jamin Lee, struck the plaintiff, Selina Meghji, while she was walking across the intersection of Blanshard Street and Cloverdale Avenue in Victoria, B.C....
The defendants bring this Rule 9-7 summary trial for an order dismissing the plaintiffs claim for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on July 29, 2006. The plaintiff brought an action and obtained a judgment in the Provincial Court of British Columbia (Small Claims Division) relating to the same accident and the defendants contend the plaintiff is therefore precluded from claiming again in relation to the same accident on the basis of res judicata.THE LAW...
This action arose in relation to a motor vehicle collision in which the plaintiff sustained injuries. The collision occurred on August 29, 2003 on the Interstate-5 in Washington State. At the time of the collision, the defendant Miranda Lee, who is the plaintiffs wife, was operating the vehicle in which the plaintiff was a passenger. The defendant Stephen Louie, was one of the lessors of the vehicle. The vehicle was owned by the defendant, MKA Leasing Ltd. Both liability and the extent and consequences of the plaintiffs injuries were issues in the action....
This was a trial to determine liability for damages resulting from a motor vehicle accident. The essential question is: who reacted to whom in commencing the chain of events that led to the impact?I. Background...
On April 18, 2007, Mr. Quartey-Harrison was driving his vehicle southbound on 200th Street in Langley. He had entered the intersection at 200th Street and 92nd Avenue on a green light and was proceeding through the intersection when his vehicle was struck on the right passenger side by a vehicle driven by the defendant Darren Klusiewich. ...
The plaintiff in this personal injury action represented himself at trial, and reasons were given on September 16, 2010. No order has yet been entered, in part because of my invitation to the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants to address the issue of costs of future medication. No present-value calculation had been tendered by the plaintiff (who, of course, has the burden of proof)....
The accused was convicted in British Columbia Provincial Court on February 5, 2010, of wilfully obstructing a peace officer, Constable Beare, in the execution of that peace officers duty, contrary to s. 129(a) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, Chap. C-46....
At approximately 11:30 a.m. on January 18, 2007, Mr. Hardip Sangha (Sangha) lost control of a tractor trailer he was driving north on Highway 97 at an S turn in the highway, near Sales Road, about 20 km south of Quesnel. He felt his vehicle slide across the road as the trailer swung around the tractor. As this occurred, Mr. Raoul Thiels (Thiels) was approaching the same location driving a tractor trailer south, toward Williams Lake. When he saw the Sangha truck sliding sideways across the road into his path of travel, he felt that there was no option but to intentionally drive his truck off the west side of the road into a ditch and snowbank. The vehicles missed each other narrowly. Sanghas truck swung around 180 degrees and ended in the ditch on the east side of Highway 97 with the tractor facing south. Thiels truck hit the bank of the ditch on the west side of the road and its trailer then pivoted across the travelled portion of the highway, blocking the southbound lane entirely and impinging significantly on the northbound lane....
The plaintiff seeks an order that:1. That the Defendant provide further and better particulars of the Defendants allegation that the Plaintiff made a willfully [sic] false statement or representation with respect to a claim as set forth at Part 3, paragraph 1(a) of the Defendants Response to Civil Claim....